{"id":2451,"date":"2002-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-07-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/cms\/?p=2451"},"modified":"2002-07-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2002-07-23T00:00:00","slug":"5417232002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/2002\/07\/23\/5417232002\/","title":{"rendered":"7\/23\/2002"},"content":{"rendered":"

“IN THE HOUSE, on July 23 [2002], three amendments to Treasury-Postal Appropriations bill (TPO) passed that ease elements of the Cuban embargo\u2026In a significant defeat for House embargo supporters, an amendment to TPO offered by Rep. Porter Goss (R-FL), which would have required Presidential certification that Cuba is not engaged in international terrorism before any changes to the travel ban take effect, lost by 182-247.\u201d [Con Embargo]<\/p>\n

Brian Alexander, \u201cEmbargo Update: Cuba Amendments on the Move,\u201d Cuba Policy Foundation,\u00a0August 5, 2002<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“IN THE HOUSE, on July 23 [2002], three amendments to Treasury-Postal Appropriations bill (TPO) passed that ease elements of the Cuban embargo\u2026In a significant defeat for House embargo supporters, an amendment to TPO offered by Rep. Porter Goss (R-FL), which would have required Presidential certification that Cuba is not engaged in international terrorism before any […]<\/p>\n

Read More… from 7\/23\/2002<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3],"class_list":["post-2451","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-quotes","tag-quotes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2442,"url":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/2002\/05\/15\/5325152002\/","url_meta":{"origin":2451,"position":0},"title":"5\/15\/2002","author":"AmarkData","date":"May 15, 2002","format":false,"excerpt":"\"In May of 2002, the forty-six member, bipartisan House Cuba Working Group (CWG) unveiled a \u2018Review of U.S. Policy Toward Cuba,\u2019 which included a nine-point legislative program to ease the Cuban embargo and take positive steps in advancing U.S. interests regarding Cuba.\u201d [Con Embargo] \u201cA Review of U.S. Policy Toward\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "quotes"","block_context":{"text":"quotes","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/category\/quotes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2439,"url":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/2002\/04\/15\/5294152002\/","url_meta":{"origin":2451,"position":1},"title":"4\/15\/2002","author":"AmarkData","date":"April 15, 2002","format":false,"excerpt":"\"With the formation of the Senate Working Group on Cuba, both chambers of the U.S. Congress now have Cuba working groups committed to a new approach on U.S. policy toward Cuba. In the House of Representatives, the bipartisan, fifty-member Cuba Working Group was formed in April 2002.\u201d \u00a0[The 15th of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "quotes"","block_context":{"text":"quotes","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/category\/quotes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2458,"url":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/2002\/11\/15\/54811152002\/","url_meta":{"origin":2451,"position":2},"title":"11\/15\/2002","author":"AmarkData","date":"November 15, 2002","format":false,"excerpt":"\"Congressional aides from fourteen offices of the House Cuba Working Group were in Havana, Cuba in November [2002] on a trip to broaden communication between the United States and Cuba and to expand Congressional knowledge of contemporary Cuba. The trip, sponsored by the Cuba Policy Foundation, included seven Republican and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "quotes"","block_context":{"text":"quotes","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/category\/quotes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2450,"url":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/2002\/07\/03\/540732002\/","url_meta":{"origin":2451,"position":3},"title":"7\/3\/2002","author":"AmarkData","date":"July 3, 2002","format":false,"excerpt":"\"July 3 [2002]. In Washington, the US House of Representatives votes 262 to 167 to end the travel ban and allow the sale of American goods to Cuba. 73 Republicans vote against the embargo.\u201d [Con Embargo] Jerry A. Sierra, \u201cEconomic Embargo Timeline,\u201d HistoryofCuba.com","rel":"","context":"In "quotes"","block_context":{"text":"quotes","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/category\/quotes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2376,"url":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/1998\/03\/20\/4663201998\/","url_meta":{"origin":2451,"position":4},"title":"3\/20\/1998","author":"AmarkData","date":"March 20, 1998","format":false,"excerpt":"\"March 20[1998]. U.S. regulations on Cuba are amended as follows: U.S. citizens may send up to $1,200 annually to relatives in Cuba. Direct passenger flights are permitted, although implementation of these amendments is not immediate.\u201d [Con Embargo] Jerry A. Sierra, \u201cEconomic Embargo Timeline,\u201d HistoryofCuba.com","rel":"","context":"In "quotes"","block_context":{"text":"quotes","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/category\/quotes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2455,"url":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/2002\/08\/05\/545852002\/","url_meta":{"origin":2451,"position":5},"title":"8\/5\/2002","author":"AmarkData","date":"August 5, 2002","format":false,"excerpt":"\"FLAKE TRAVEL AMENDMENT\u2026AMENDMENT NO. 1: At the end of the bill, insert after the last section (preceding the short title) the following new section: \u00a0SEC. __. (a) None of the funds made available in this Act may be used to administer or enforce part 515 of title 31, Code of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "quotes"","block_context":{"text":"quotes","link":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/category\/quotes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2451","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2451"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2451\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2451"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2451"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/archive.amarkfoundation.org\/cubanembargo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2451"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}